Nordic Education Academy.
Sample school · Demo International School
Demo International School · 2026/27 · 15 September 2026

Good evening, Anna

One of three priorities is moving · Three things need you · Next leadership moment 30 Sep

Focus this year

01

Strengthen MYP unit planning quality

Progressing 1 commitment overdue · evidence recorded

Next
First moderation cycle completed · 30 Sep
Lead
MYP Coordinator
Tell me more
What difference are we making?
Subject teams consistently produce coherent, criterion-aligned MYP unit plans using agreed programme expectations.
How will we know?
Qualitative: judged from the peer review rota and review records. Deliberately not scored.
Latest evidence
Eight unit plans reviewed against the agreed programme expectations. Six met them in full. · 12 Sep
Contributors
MYP Coordinator
Delivery
0 of 3 milestones delivered · 2 commitments completed · 3 commitments under way

View priority →

02

Improve student belonging & wellbeing

Progressing

Next
Grade 9 advisory implementation ready for next term · 9 Oct
Lead
Head of Pastoral
Tell me more
What difference are we making?
Students experience a stronger sense of belonging through a coherent advisory programme.
Latest evidence
Advisory sessions observed in two year groups; engagement high. · 12 Sep
Contributors
Head of Pastoral
Delivery
0 of 1 milestone delivered · 0 commitments completed · 1 commitment under way

View priority →

03

Build teacher professional learning culture

Direction agreed Outcome still to define

The next step is to define impact, who leads it, evidence and next.

Tell me more
Latest evidence
No evidence recorded yet.
Contributors
Deputy Principal
Delivery
No milestones defined yet · 0 commitments completed · 1 commitment under way

View priority →

Needs you 3

  • Decision required

    Raised 8 Sep · return 22 Sep

    Why am I seeing this?
    • Raised at SLT weekly — moderation · 8 Sep
    • Recorded as discussed but not decided
    • Return date 22 Sep
    • Linked to “Strengthen MYP unit planning quality”
  • Decision required

    All 3 open commitments for “Strengthen MYP unit planning quality” are currently assigned to the MYP Coordinator.

    Why am I seeing this?
    • All 3 open commitments for “Strengthen MYP unit planning quality” are currently assigned to the MYP Coordinator.
    Possible responses
    • Reassign part of the work to a named second owner
    • Extend the timeline and accept slower delivery
    • Fund release time or additional capacity

    Options, not recommendations. The decision is yours.

  • Review due

    Confirmed 25 Aug · 21 days ago

    Why am I seeing this?
    • Status “Progressing” confirmed 25 Aug
    • 21 days since confirmation
    • The linked work has moved since then
    • Linked to “Strengthen MYP unit planning quality”

Worth your attention Noticed, not asking for a decision

Three concerns are clustering around “Strengthen MYP unit planning quality”
Why am I seeing this?
  • Three concerns have been recorded against “Strengthen MYP unit planning quality” in the last 30 days.
Possible responses
  • Treat as one shared capability need and address collectively
  • Commission a short review before acting
  • Record as accepted risk with a review date

Options, not recommendations. The decision is yours.

Coming up

  1. 30 Sep First moderation cycle completed MYP
  2. 9 Oct Grade 9 advisory implementation ready for nex… Whole school
  3. 31 Oct Curriculum review completed across subject te… MYP

View Leadership Clock →

Movement this term

  1. 8 Sep Decision made Introduce a fortnightly MYP planning review
  2. 11 Sep Decision made Change the assessment planning requirement for Term 2
  3. 12 Sep Evidence added Student survey review
  4. 12 Sep Evidence added Unit plan review — cycle 1 sample
  5. 30 Sep Next major moment First moderation cycle completed
Everything that changed